Chronic Willful ignorance is a form of learned helplessness; the acute form can just be “play oppossum.” Given the murderousness of the Cheney-Bush-CIA cabal controlling the “Military Industrial Complex” (ref. Ike), and his pretty high profile, I don’t doubt that he’s been warned to “go along to get along (with his very Life!).
In response to a question at the University of Florida recently, Noam Chomsky claimed that there were only “a miniscule number of architects and engineers” who felt that the official account of WTC Building 7 should be treated with skepticism. Chomsky followed-up by saying, “a tiny number—a couple of them—are perfectly serious.”
If signing your name and credentials to a public petition on the subject means being serious, then Noam Chomsky’s tiny number begins at 2,100, not counting scientists and other professionals. Why would Chomsky make such an obvious exaggeration when he has been presented with contradictory facts many times?
I’ve personally had over thirty email exchanges with Chomsky. In those exchanges, he has agreed that it is “conceivable” that explosives might have been used at the WTC. But, he wrote, if that were the case it would have had to be Saddam Hussein or Osama bin Laden who…
View original post 1,036 more words